Piaget on
Cognitive
Development
Piaget
on Moral
Development
Kohlberg
on Moral
Development
Preschool
Early Childhood
Kindergarten
Pre-Kindergarten
● They can’t decenter or take the
perspective of others but are imitative.
● They can sense and perceive but not symbolically manipulate.
● They cannot comprehend classes and subclasses.
● They cannot relate to adults’ abstract reasoning.
● They can’t reflect on or think about their own thinking.
● They assume you know what they know.
●  They are subject to the morality of constraint.
●  They exhibit social play but do not try to win.
●  Justice is viewed as that commanded by authority.
●  Casual attitude about rules.
●  Authority maintains egocentrism.
●  Egocentrism a step between the solitary play of younger children and the social play of children six and older.
 (Preconventional 1)
●  They display heteronomous or adult-dependent morality.
●  They think in absolutes of right and wrong.
●  They have an egocentric viewpoint.
●  They are good to avoid
   punishment or gain rewards.
●  They view the value of life the way they do the value of objects.
Early Elementary
Middle Childhood
First and Second
Grades
Concrete Operations
●  They move from perceptual or pre-
    operational to conceptual or concrete-operational thought, i.e., they begin to
   solve problems in their heads because they can manipulate objects symbolically.
● They cannot imagine events that are not real events, need real things to think about, and cannot think abstractly.
● They can take the perspective of others.
● They are becoming more and more interested in their peers.
● They willfully engage in social cooperation.
●  They display instrumental cooperation.
●  They are largely subject to the morality of constraint.
●  They want to win by age seven but have a vague notion of game rules.
●  They view rules as sacred and unchangeable.
●  They view justice as that which is commanded by authority.   
(Preconventional 2)
●  They see right as that which satisfies their needs.
●  They have a concrete, pleasure/ reward-seeking, individualistic perspective.
●  Their cooperation is instrumental, and they exchange favors to satisfy needs.
●  The value of life is viewed as instrumental to need satisfaction.     
Late Elementary
Late Childhood
Grades
Three Through Five
●  They are in transition between heteronomy and moral autonomy.
●  They come to know codified game rules and show an intense interest in them.
●  They continue to view rules as unchangeable.
●  They view justice in terms of equality that comes about from solidarity and mutual respect.   
(Conventional 3)
●  They view right as what gains approval.
●  They have an interpersonal, Golden Rule, good-child/bad-child perspective.
●  They gain approval by being caring and accommodating toward significant others.
●  They view the value of life in terms of affectional bonds.
Middle School
Early Adolescence
Grades
Six Through Eight
High School
Late Adolescence
Grades
Nine Through Twelve
Formal Operations
●  They move from concrete operational to formal-operational thought, think logically and abstractly, and begin to manipulate
    symbols in their heads. They can imagine hypothetical as well as real
    events.
●  They can introspect, reflect, and think about their own thinking.
●  They can consider many view-points and take the perspective of others fully.
●  They are much more self-conscious than they were previously.
●  They have principled moral autonomy, morality emerging from cooperation.
●  Their rule mastery and codification of game rules, that began at about age
    ten, continues.
●  They view justice as equity,not equality.
●  Rules are viewed as a changeable product of mutual consent.
(Conventional 4)
●  They view right as doing one's duty, showing respect to authority, and main-
    taining social order.
●  They have an organizational-need, societal-need, law-maintaining view.
●  They view life as sacred within the context of a scheme or moral rights.
(Post-conventional)
●  They view right as guarding basic rights and legal contracts, or as meeting mutual obligations in context of societal rights and standards.
●  They have a law-creating, moral-legal view that obligates them to honor social commitments.
●  Principled moral reasoning.
unexplained
Juxtaposition of   Relevant
Developmental Theories
(part 2 is on the next slide)
Developed by Gordon Vessels 1998 ©
This is the first half of a two-page chart that aligns Piaget’s theory of cognitive development with various other cognitive and affective theories of social, emotional, and moral development, including Piaget’s largely cognitive theory of moral development.  This first half includes a further breakdown of Kohlberg’s pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional levels of moral reasoning.  Kohlberg also included descriptions of the changes in children’s thinking about the value of life.  This sequence begins with young children viewing life like other objects and moving on in later childhood to view life as instrumental to need satisfaction.  He said that children eventually come to view life in terms of the closeness of relationships, but that it is not until adolescence that life is viewed as sacred and worthy of being protected by a context of moral rights.  You can look across the two halves of this chart to see how Piaget’s and Kohlberg’s developmental levels or phases and the ages at which they typically emerge compare with the propositions of Damon, Hoffman, Selman, and.  Like Piaget, Damon explained moral development from more than one perspective including changing conceptions of fairness and changing views of authority.  Now move on to the second half of this chart where we can examine more closely Damon’s explanation of children’s changing conceptions of fairness..